'It should be banned!' - Why O'Sullivan's chalk is 'hated' by snooker players

Ronnie O'Sullivan's unique approach to chalk application has become one of the most controversial topics in professional snooker, with multiple players openly calling for the practice to be prohibited. The seven-time World Champion, known for his unorthodox techniques both on and off the table, has been accused of applying chalk in a manner that allegedly creates an unfair advantage during matches.

Watch the highlights:

Former professional player and current commentator Joe O'Connor recently stated that O'Sullivan's chalk technique "should be banned," adding that the practice is "hated" by many of his competitors. The controversy stems from O'Sullivan's method of applying chalk more frequently and thoroughly than other players, with some suggesting this results in more consistent cue ball control.

The issue has gained renewed attention following O'Sullivan's controversial defeat to fellow legend John Higgins at the Crucible Theatre. Despite the loss, the chalk debate continues to rage within the snooker community, with players divided over whether the technique constitutes gamesmanship or an unfair advantage.

World Snooker Tour officials have yet to comment on potential rule changes regarding chalk application. The organization's current regulations do not specify restrictions on how players apply chalk to their cues, leaving O'Sullivan within the rules despite mounting criticism from his peers.

O'Sullivan himself has dismissed the controversy, suggesting critics should focus on their own game rather than his preparation methods. The debate highlights the fine line between legal preparation techniques and potential competitive advantages in elite sport, with the snooker world awaiting any potential regulatory response to the growing controversy.