Mike Dean Says He Took Part in Secret Challenges While Refereeing

Former Premier League referee Mike Dean has said he took part in private challenges while officiating top-flight matches, including seeing how long he could remain inside the centre circle. The claims were made during an appearance on Jamie Vardy’s podcast and were reported by The Guardian on Thursday.

Watch the highlights:

Dean said that, before the introduction of video assistant refereeing, he sometimes tried to let games continue for extended periods without blowing his whistle. He claimed that on several occasions he went 20 or 25 minutes without stopping play. He also described testing how long he could stay in the centre circle before the action required him to move elsewhere.

According to Dean, one attempt at the centre-circle challenge lasted about 15 minutes. He presented the exercises as lighthearted conduct during matches. The Guardian reported, however, that officials within the refereeing organisation Pro Ref were puzzled by the account and considered it highly improbable that a referee could remain in the centre circle for that long without attracting attention.

There is no evidence that the alleged challenges occurred, according to refereeing officials cited by the newspaper. The report therefore leaves Dean’s descriptions as claims rather than independently established events. It does not identify specific matches in which the challenges were said to have taken place.

Dean spent more than two decades among the select group of Premier League referees before retiring from on-field officiating in 2022. He subsequently worked briefly as a video assistant referee. Across a 22-year top-flight career, he handled 561 matches and issued 114 red cards, which The Guardian described as a record.

The former official has previously drawn attention for comments about his refereeing work. In 2023, Dean was removed from VAR duty after failing to intervene over an error during a Tottenham-Chelsea match refereed by Anthony Taylor. Dean later said in an interview that he had not asked Taylor to review the decision because he did not want to add to the pressure on his colleague. His latest remarks have again placed his approach to officiating under scrutiny.